This article is dedicated to the women and working moms I know who 
strive to make society better, one choice at a time. I've been so 
inspired lately by the many women I see starting their own businesses, 
whether they are raising kids or because they realize they want more out
 of their life and careers than working 9-5 for the next 30 years. For 
simply recognizing and admitting out loud that this rat race is not for 
them, this article is for you.
Can I just start by saying, "Enough already!!" A while ago I read this 
article on
 the Huffington Post about the ongoing 'mommy wars' - the supposed fight between 
stay-at-home moms and career moms in the (ridiculous) quest for ultimate
 mom supremacy. The article is titled "The Real Reason Working Moms 
Dislike Other Moms" and was spurred by the recent comments between the 
wives of U.S. politicians. One critiqued the other for 'never having 
worked a day in her life' while the other countered that raising 5 boys 
was work enough, thank you very much.
The article was 
written by a man, and I only mention this because he wrote a very good 
and balanced article on the topic - something that, in my opinion has 
been clearly missing from the conversation (I refuse to call it a 
debate). Clearly he is tired of observing one camp lobbing insults at 
the other, and wanted to diffuse the situation by discussing both sides 
of the so-called mommy war.
Now let's get something 
straight first off - the fact that I am referring to 'sides' doesn't 
mean that I agree or even acknowledge that there is a mommy-war. Maybe 
that is more prevalent in the U.S. or in circles that I don't socialize 
in, however, the only references I've heard to a mommy-war seem to be 
media driven, so I'm not entirely sure such a 'war' exists. But I 
digress...
The author, Rick Newman, discusses the undeniable tension that 
arises when the conversation turns to working versus staying at home 
with the kids. I'm not sure that I've personally ever witnessed this 
tension myself or seen a debate on the topic but I'd be lying if I said 
that I wasn't envious of the moms I hear of that either work part-time, 
work from home or stay at home. And I don't think I'm alone. I've 
recently had many conversations with mothers and ALL of them result in 
the same conclusion: wanting to spend more time raising our children AND
 having a career. Unfortunately though, by the time we realize that this
 is what we want rather than returning to work full-time, most of us 
have already built a life on two incomes and can't find a way around it 
when the reality of going back to work slaps us in the face.
It is for that reason that I almost curse the feminists of the 
'60s. This may seem like a harsh statement but here's my reasoning. 
Those feminists who fought for women to be accepted working outside the 
home in a 'man's world' turned into the full-time working women of the 
70s. The mold was then formed for other modern women to follow in their 
footsteps because 'times have changed' and so, they got jobs and raised 
the next generation of women and mothers to think this is the way life 
is and should be, afterall they fought for that standard of living. And 
so, the feminism of the '60s seemed to manifest itself in one of the 
most tangible ways possible - by women being accepted into a social 
structure that was built around the life of men as the bread winners - 
where that was their only role. (And this structure I'm referring to was
 already around for decades by this point. We're talking a structure 
that was established in a post-industrial revolution society where the 
work week was structured to limit people to ONLY work 5 or 6 days per 
week, 8 hours per day so that workers weren't taken advantage of - and 
it's been that way ever since).
The problem with this 
structure is two-fold: it was designed for a world that didn't exist any
 longer in the 1970s, let alone now; and it was designed around workers 
who for the most part, didn't have to raise children and run the house 
as well as work full-time. Now fast forward to our society where 
technology has made our productivity soar yet, we are still mostly 
confined to very rigid job structures that, in our lifetime, no longer 
reflect necessity. 
After being raised to believe girls can accomplish 
anything and watch our mothers become educated and hold full-time jobs, 
most of the women I speak to enjoy striving to learn and have a career. 
The trouble is, society isn't structured to support a balance with the 
roles of mother and career woman. Instead, we are supposed to do more 
with less time, and the only time we discuss ever managing more 
efficiently is our after work time. I find this archaic and completely 
ridiculously out-dated. We can do so much
 more with our time, it's a shame that for the majority, the structure of the work week 
hasn't evolved with our productivity. 
And feminists, like the author interviewed in this Globe and Mail 
article,
 who are shuddering at the thought of women voluntarily taking 
themselves out of the workforce: chill out. This isn't putting women's 
rights back 40 years either, as this book claims. If anything, it's 
about being progressive and demanding a change in the way society is 
structured. If that means removing yourself from the 'traditional' 
structure of work because you want to dedicate more of your time to 
raising your family, so be it. Look at the huge jump of women and 
'mompreneurs' in the past decade who have started their own business. 
It's not a coincidence; it's a sign of the times, and a sign that a 
revolution has already begun.
Maybe the notion I am supporting in this article will be 
criticized for 'wanting it all', but I think that as a society, we have 
changed. It's not such an unrealistic expectation for the way we live to
 change from one generation to the next. It has happened almost every 
generation before us - why do we need to keep the status quo?
I
 am not afraid to say that I do want it all! It's not selfish or putting
 me ahead of the kids and family. It's about redefining the role of a 
women as both a mother and wife and working member of society. I know 
that I would not only be a happier person, but this would translate into
 a happier mom and wife and family life, and by extension, a more 
productive contributor to society.
Instead of struggling 
to keep up during the week, only to be exhausted at the end of the 
night, have barely enough time let alone energy to spend quality time 
with my husband, I would have the mundane taken care of while spending 
more time with the kids AND bringing in money because I know I can be 
productive given certain windows of the day that work best for my 
schedule. Come the weekend, as a family we could use those cherished two
 days to do more than playing laundry catch-up, going grocery shopping 
and running all over to lessons and recitals.
The bottom line is, whether you are a working mom or 
stay-at-home mom, we each want a bit of what each other has. How about 
we support each other by trying to find ways to push through change in 
the structure of employment as we know it, so that we work towards a 
common goal rather than taking sides and arguing about which choice is 
best? Tell ring yoyour employer duur next review that you have feedback 
on the structure of your job. Let our opinions on this be heard whenever
 there is an opportunity. Write letters like 
this to
 the editors of newspapers and magazines to show how hard it is to 
choose. And most of all, let's cheer each other on while we push through
 change, knowing that for the time being, neither decision to work or 
stay at home is without struggle or compromise, but we are all driven by
 the same desire: to continuing improving the quality of life for our 
families and society as we raise the next generation of people.
If you like this article, please share it with others you think 
will enjoy it! Copy and paste the link at the top of the page and send 
it. Thank you. :-)